vulns.co
/
GKData.io MCP

Conceptual model · 1 min read

Build evidence must match the artifact and trusted builder

Editorial conceptual model combining the Angular case with SLSA build guidance. The case supports separating automation trust and shared build state; the consumer verification gate is a general design synthesis, not a reconstruction of Angular remediation. Assumes a defined trust policy for builders and provenance. Provenance presence alone does not establish authenticity, and passing these checks does not prove the software is free of vulnerabilities.

The conceptual model

Untrusted contributions remain separated from trusted build state. An artifact and its provenance reach a consumer policy gate. Only authenticated evidence matching the artifact and expected builder and inputs makes it eligible for release review; missing or mismatched evidence prevents promotion.
Untrusted contributions remain separated from trusted build state. An artifact and its provenance reach a consumer policy gate. Only authenticated evidence matching the artifact and expected builder and inputs makes it eligible for release review; missing or mismatched evidence prevents promotion.

Cases and references behind the model

Sources and provenance

  1. adnanthekhan.com Primary source
  2. slsa.dev Primary source
  3. slsa.dev Primary source

Record reviewed 2026-10-03. Snapshot d5550c789111. Open the complete JSON contract.

GitHub snapshot 2026-10-04

d5550c789111 · JSON exports & schemas · CC BY 4.0 content / MIT software